The Concept of Architectural Code Analysis and Planning Process
Before we discuss the architectural code analysis it is important to know what it actually is. This is a group of people that help the local government with the creation of the plans and the regulations of many buildings and structures in an area. The people who perform this are called architectural engineers and the job they perform is to make sure the local governments understand what is being designed and why. If the plan review is not done correctly then the result could be disastrous.
Architectural code analysis process
There are five stages involved in the architectural service code analysis process. They are architectural, structural, environmental, economic, and usability. In the previous article I explained the importance of each and how they interact with each other. In this article I will go into more detail about each of them. The first stage involves the architectural details of the plan and call programming. This would include such things as floor plans, building location and current zoning laws.
An architectural detail is something that is very important and is required by the architectural code analysis process. This is the first part of the project and is normally the most difficult part of the whole process. It involves many meetings between the various parties involved such as the architect, the construction company, the local government, and neighbors. After the site plan is reviewed and approved it goes into the structural phase.
In the architectural code analysis the next step involves the structural specifics. These details describe the relationship among existing building materials, structure designs, and any operational requirements. Usually the site plan shows several layouts of possible structural layouts but the actual structural layouts are worked out after the site plan is reviewed and approved. A reasonable schedule is developed and submitted to the local government for approval.
Modeling and testing of the designs
Another part of the code analysis process involves the modeling and testing of the designs. This requires a significant amount of skill in order to evaluate and justify the models of the selected contractor. Model-driven development (MFD) is a process of designing and testing structures based on the guidelines and specifications provided by the code analysis. When the molds are released september 1, the model-driven development team includes the following people: the engineer, mechanical engineer, architect, and civil engineers.
One of the main reasons why many communities require an Architectural Review is to ensure that there is consistent interpretation of the codes. Some cities and towns require an Architectural Review to be done every three years, while other communities require it released every seven years. In some cases an architectural/technical review is also conducted instead of the Architectural Review. The reasons for these delays in release of the final architectural specifications may include change management that was made to the original design specifications or new technological information that becomes available after the model-driven development is completed. There are some areas that have a statutory deadline for releasing the final model/model-based development specifications.
If the proposed use of the structure is not allowed by the current architectural plan the first step is the drafting of the rules and regulations of the workplace strategy. A public hearing will be held for the purpose of determining whether the proposed use is in accordance with the applicable laws. The public hearing will be attended by the concerned officials and the experts from both the city and the federal government. After the hearing the members of the board of supervisors or the site planning commission will decide if the proposed use is in accordance with the existing laws. If the project is disapproved then the architects must submit a written statement of objections within forty-five days. The architectural experts are required to provide additional written information and documentation within a stipulated period of time.
If at the public hearing the approval of the corporate architecture job is still not obtained the healthcare or commercial architects may submit additional written information. At the pre-application meeting the architects are expected to present their plans to the city and the county planning department for review and comment. If the department approves the plan then the engineers or consultants are required to submit their final reports to the concerned departments. All the requirements of the current building codes are fulfilled and a certificate of occupancy will then be issued. If at the end of the year the certificate of occupancy is not yet issued, the owners have to obtain it from the regional planning commission.